Unfortunately you don't have to look far in Idaho.
Yesterday the House State Affairs committee voted 11-7 to send a bill allowing election day liquor sales to the full House. Ya know -- to update a centuries old law that isn't really applicable now. It passed committee, and that is good, but you'll notice the vote; 7 Idaho Republicans voted to keep this archaic law in place. Eagle Representative Raul Labrador (R) had this to say:
“I will be voting against this. … The mission of the liquor dispensary is to promote temperance and sobriety. … I think this is contrary to that.”
Ah... Ok, I don't agree but ok.
Other Republicans who voted against allowing you, as a citizen to choose whether or not you can buy booze on election day were:
- Rep.Tom Loertscher, R-Iona
- Reps Bert Stevenson, R-Rupert
- Ken Andrus, R-Lava Hot Springs
- Brent Crane, R-Nampa
- Steve Kren, R-Nampa
- Russ Mathews, R-Idaho Falls
Now there is this:
Tamarack wants 10 more liquor licenses
BOISE, Idaho — Idaho lawmakers Wednesday asked Tamarack Resort to rework legislation that would increase the number of third-party liquor licenses allowed at year-round resorts from three to 13.
Tamarack, a ski resort and real-estate development near McCall, is proposing the bill in hopes of expanding the number of its restaurants and hotels that offer liquor.
In 2006, the Legislature approved an exemption to the state's liquor laws to benefit Tamarack. Typically, state law allows a single liquor license for every 1,500 people within city limits. The exemption allowed up to three licenses at four-season resorts, charges applicants a $25,000 fee and in Tamarack's case cleared the way for cocktails at a swank hotel project financed by tennis stars Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf.
The bill is currently in the Senate State Affairs committee awaiting some re-drafting, so my questions are:
- How will these Representatives vote the bill when it comes to the House?
- Will they vote for temperance as they did when it comes to ordinary citizens drinking?
- Will they vote for the big business lobby?
- How did these Representatives vote when the law was changed to allow special rules granting liquor licenses for Tamarack in the first place?
- What about when they changed the law to allow a liquor license for Qwest Arena?
Lobbyists make the world go 'round, they they can buy you a legislature in Idaho I guess.
You see, my problem is this (hypothetically speaking) -- say I buy a property in Downtown Nampa and wish to open up a subtle, if not refined imbibing establishment, so I'll need a liquor license, 'cause I like a good mixed drink here and there. What? All the liquor licenses are bought up in my area? The quota has been filled? Ah, the government imposed monopoly has been successful in artificially raising the price for me to own a sanctioned house of swilling. I see.
Problem being is that I can't go to the legislature and get a special bill to allow an exception for my small 3 person operation. I'm out of luck. I've got to either wait on the state waiting list to buy a liquor license at face value or buy one for the artificial price of 100k or so.
I'm just a citizen, so the state government who not only thinks they know when I should and should not be able to buy or drink booze is essentionally pricing me out of selling booze as well. Free market capitalism alive and well in Idaho? Think again, only if you can afford a lobbyist to loosen the apparent moral conundrums affecting Idaho legislators.
Well, I wouldn't have a lobbyist working on my behalf so I would be out of luck and Downtown Nampa would be out of a new, subtle, if not refined imbibing establishment.
I look forward to seeing how this plays out.
Recent Comments