While I think it's safe to say that this is a good thing, I think it's also safe to say that there will be some backlash from Idaho's Conservative community.
Idaho Statesman:
Federal abstinence funds find fewer takers
Idaho decided to opt out of the grants because the money was uncertain - and because the program didn't seem effective.
Idaho and other states are saying no to millions of federal dollars for abstinence education, skeptical of how well the program works and worried about on-and-off funding.
The Bush administration touts the abstinence-only program as a way to slow teen sexual activity. Barely half the states are still in, and two more say they are leaving.
I will say this; abstinence is the best method to prevent against STDs and teen pregnancy, it is the only fool-proof method. That being said, it is not realistic, as in; based in reality. Teens are going to have sex, they've been having sex for thousands of years, they certainly aren't going to stop now because mom, dad and teacher all tell them to not do it. So it is best that teens are educated in the proper methods to protect themselves against STD's and pregnancy. Sure, it'd be a good thing to reduce teens having sex overall, but this has to be combined with proper education about contraceptives.
Personally, I'm all for the graphic STD pictures -- we used to get these slides in the Army during Safety Stand Down days that showed graphic photos of just what STDs can, and will do to your genitals. I do believe that they used to use them in public schools until whiny parents didn't want to scare their little non-sex-having children -- they should bring it back. Nothing like a puss filled image of what your goods could end up looking like to make you think twice about doing something you probably shouldn't be doing in the first place. Or at least make you think about taking the proper precautions -- if you know how.
Recent Comments